Fuel cell performance and durability
PEM and solid oxide fuel cell behaviour under realistic load profiles, humidity and temperature.
Fuel cells and conversion
Support where selectivity, interfaces, durability and operating windows decide whether a conversion concept is genuinely usable.
What we look at
PEM and solid oxide fuel cell behaviour under realistic load profiles, humidity and temperature.
Platinum-group-metal loading, ionomer distribution and electrode structure.
Faradaic efficiency, product selectivity and stability beyond short laboratory runs.
Electrochemical production of chemicals and fuels, and what limits scale-up.
Water and gas management, including flooding, which often decides lifetime in conversion cells.
Current density, temperature and feed purity requirements versus what a real plant can provide.
Typical questions
How evidence is built
Confirming that reported product yields close the carbon or nitrogen balance.
Run times and conditions long enough to reveal drift rather than initial performance.
Identifying which electrode or interface limits performance.
Showing which performance metric moves the cost case most.
Yes. PEM and solid oxide fuel cells share many materials and failure questions with electrolysers, and the same evidence-first approach applies to both.
By checking selectivity and current density together, confirming the carbon balance, and asking whether stability has been shown over a realistic duration rather than a short demonstration.
Yes. A route comparison sets technical maturity, the key performance gaps and the evidence still needed side by side, so the decision rests on more than headline numbers.
Describe the system, the decision and the evidence you already have. That is enough for a useful first conversation.