Fuel cells and conversion

Fuel cell and electrochemical conversion engineering.

Support where selectivity, interfaces, durability and operating windows decide whether a conversion concept is genuinely usable.

What we look at

Where conversion concepts succeed or stall.

Fuel cell performance and durability

PEM and solid oxide fuel cell behaviour under realistic load profiles, humidity and temperature.

Catalyst layers and electrodes

Platinum-group-metal loading, ionomer distribution and electrode structure.

CO₂ and nitrogen electroreduction

Faradaic efficiency, product selectivity and stability beyond short laboratory runs.

Electrosynthesis routes

Electrochemical production of chemicals and fuels, and what limits scale-up.

Gas diffusion electrodes

Water and gas management, including flooding, which often decides lifetime in conversion cells.

Operating window and system fit

Current density, temperature and feed purity requirements versus what a real plant can provide.

Typical questions

Questions teams bring to us

  • Is selectivity stable over realistic run times?
  • Which interface or catalyst layer limits durability?
  • Is the operating window practical outside the lab?

How evidence is built

Methods we design test plans around and interpret

  1. Selectivity and mass-balance checks

    Confirming that reported product yields close the carbon or nitrogen balance.

  2. Long-duration stability testing

    Run times and conditions long enough to reveal drift rather than initial performance.

  3. Impedance and polarisation analysis

    Identifying which electrode or interface limits performance.

  4. Techno-economic sensitivity

    Showing which performance metric moves the cost case most.

Frequently asked questions

Does Redionix work on fuel cells as well as electrolysers?

Yes. PEM and solid oxide fuel cells share many materials and failure questions with electrolysers, and the same evidence-first approach applies to both.

How do you assess a CO₂ electroreduction result?

By checking selectivity and current density together, confirming the carbon balance, and asking whether stability has been shown over a realistic duration rather than a short demonstration.

Can you help decide between conversion routes?

Yes. A route comparison sets technical maturity, the key performance gaps and the evidence still needed side by side, so the decision rests on more than headline numbers.

Working on something in this area?

Describe the system, the decision and the evidence you already have. That is enough for a useful first conversation.