Stack and cell performance
Polarisation behaviour and efficiency at rated current density, and how claims compare with operating reality.
Electrolysers and hydrogen
Independent technical judgement on stack performance, degradation and materials choices, so hydrogen programmes commit to evidence rather than headline efficiency.
What we look at
Polarisation behaviour and efficiency at rated current density, and how claims compare with operating reality.
Voltage decay rates, catalyst dissolution, membrane thinning and what accelerated tests can and cannot predict.
Thrifting strategies for PEM anodes, nickel-based alternatives for alkaline and AEM, and the trade-offs they bring.
Gas crossover, chemical stability and mechanical durability under dynamic operation.
Contact resistance, coatings and how interfaces shape both efficiency and lifetime.
Start-stop cycling, partial load and coupling to variable renewable power.
Typical questions
How evidence is built
Separating activation, ohmic and mass-transport losses so improvements target the dominant one.
Tracking how resistance and kinetics change over time and operating conditions.
Protocols that stress the failure mode that matters, with a clear link to field conditions.
Deciding which materials characterisation will explain the result before the stack is opened.
PEM, alkaline, anion exchange membrane (AEM) and solid oxide (SOEC) systems. The common thread is reading cell and stack evidence critically and connecting it to development and investment decisions.
Yes. A review compares the claimed efficiency and degradation rate with the underlying test conditions, durations and baselines, and sets out which claims are well supported and which need more evidence.
A risk-ranked view of the technical case, the evidence still missing before the next stage, and a test plan to close the most important gaps.
Describe the system, the decision and the evidence you already have. That is enough for a useful first conversation.